This assessment asks students to reason about the reliability of the engraving and to think about other information that could help them evaluate its reliability. For Question 1, students must explain that, as a court artist, Benoist may have had incentive to depict the king in a flattering way. For Question 2, students must identify other information that would help them evaluate the reliability of the images and clearly explain why this information would help them. Students might wonder about the relationship between Louis XIV and the court artists, which could shed more light on whether Benoist felt pressure to depict Louis in a particular way. They might also wonder about whether all of the images were created at the same time or whether the images were created across the decades. This would shed light on whether the images of Louis as a child were created decades after his childhood, which may make them less reliable as evidence.
Level: Proficient
Question 1
Student identifies relevant background information and explains why it might call the reliability of the images into question.
Question 2
Student identifies relevant information and explains how it would help to determine the reliability of the images.
Level: Emergent
Question 1
Student identifies relevant background information that might call the reliability of the images into question but does not provide a complete explanation.
Question 2
Student identifies relevant information but does not adequately explain how it would help to determine the reliability of the images.
Level: Basic
Question 1
Student does not identify relevant background information that might call the reliability of the images into question.
Question 2
Student does not identify relevant information.